Skip to main content


"Death of the Author" never originally meant "ignore the problematic aspects of the author" or "forget about the author."

It meant that the author's opinion of their own work was not authoritative and, in fact, that there could be no "definitive" interpretation. It was about how each individual's interpretation could be considered authoritative in its own right

It wasn't supposed to be about "we can ignore the author being terrible or trying to push a narrative." It works at a different level

in reply to Hrefna (DHC)

does that also apply to the very term "death of the author", that there is no definitive interpretation and people are in fact free to authoritatively interpret it to mean the thing it wasn't originally meant to mean?
Unknown parent

@wayfinder Re: "As valid or invalid as anyone's", I'm a big fan of death of the author, but certain readers can have more thorough insight into or expertise with the text than others, and I still think it's worth granting that the author, even if not authoritative, can still be assumed to be an expert in the text, and thus be more worth listening to than most random readers. Of course, they can also be a dumbass